BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//PYVOBJECT//NONSGML Version 1//EN
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/Brussels
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:20001029T030000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=-1SU;BYMONTH=10
TZNAME:CET
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:20000326T020000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=-1SU;BYMONTH=3
TZNAME:CEST
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
END:DAYLIGHT
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:20260720T092207Z - 65426@eupv478
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Brussels:20230511T140000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Brussels:20230511T170000
CREATED:20260720T092207Z
DESCRIPTION:<a href="https://www.legitech.lu/event/structuring-alternative-
 investments-in-the-post-beps-era-the-mandatory-disclosure-regime-dac6-499/
 register">Structuring alternative investments in the post-BEPS era - the m
 andatory disclosure regime (DAC6)</a>\nPRESENTATION Module 4 - 11/05/2023 
 - 2 to 5 PM : the mandatory disclosure regime (DAC6) Under the mandatory d
 isclosure regime (“MDR”)\, tax intermediaries such as tax advisers\, a
 ccountants and lawyers that design\, promote or provide assistance in rega
 rd to certain cross-border arrangements have to report these to the tax au
 thorities. Since the implementation of the MDR\, the analysis of potential
  reporting obligations has become an integral part of each and every tax a
 nalysis. The MDR operates through a system of hallmarks that may trigger r
 eporting obligations and the main benefit test (“MBT”) that functions 
 as a threshold requirement for many of these hallmarks. As such\, the MBT 
 should filter out irrelevant reporting and enhance the usefulness of the i
 nformation collected because the focus will be on arrangements that have a
  higher probability of truly presenting a risk of tax avoidance. However\,
  how are reportable cross-border arrangements determined? How should some 
 of the more ambiguous hallmarks be interpreted? And\, what is a reasonable
  approach towards the interpretation of the main benefit test (MBT)? All t
 hese questions will be answered during this webinar organised in co-operat
 ion with Legitech. >>> Program Introduction Key features of the disclosure
  regime Arrangements\, intermediaries and other interpretation issues The 
 hallmarks of reportable arrangements The main benefit test (MBT) – Devel
 oping a reasonable approach Managing DAC 6 obligations in practice Case st
 udies The Real Estate Fund The Private Equity Fund DAC6Connect – The IT 
 solution for DAC 6 reporting obligations ORATEURS OLIVER R. HOOR Tax Partn
 er and Head of Transfer Pricing\, ATOZ Tax Advisers Oliver is a Partner in
  the International & Corporate Tax department at ATOZ. A tax professional 
 since 2003\, Oliver has experience in Luxembourg and international taxatio
 n with a focus on alternative [...]
DTSTAMP:20260720T092207Z
LOCATION:ATOZ Tax Advisers\, Aerogolf Center\, 1B rue Heienhaff\, Senninger
 berg  1736\, Luxembourg
SUMMARY:Structuring alternative investments in the post-BEPS era - the mand
 atory disclosure regime (DAC6)
X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:<a href="https://www.legitech.lu/event/structu
 ring-alternative-investments-in-the-post-beps-era-the-mandatory-disclosure
 -regime-dac6-499/register">Structuring alternative investments in the post
 -BEPS era - the mandatory disclosure regime (DAC6)</a>\nPRESENTATION Modul
 e 4 - 11/05/2023 - 2 to 5 PM : the mandatory disclosure regime (DAC6) Unde
 r the mandatory disclosure regime (“MDR”)\, tax intermediaries such as
  tax advisers\, accountants and lawyers that design\, promote or provide a
 ssistance in regard to certain cross-border arrangements have to report th
 ese to the tax authorities. Since the implementation of the MDR\, the anal
 ysis of potential reporting obligations has become an integral part of eac
 h and every tax analysis. The MDR operates through a system of hallmarks t
 hat may trigger reporting obligations and the main benefit test (“MBT”
 ) that functions as a threshold requirement for many of these hallmarks. A
 s such\, the MBT should filter out irrelevant reporting and enhance the us
 efulness of the information collected because the focus will be on arrange
 ments that have a higher probability of truly presenting a risk of tax avo
 idance. However\, how are reportable cross-border arrangements determined?
  How should some of the more ambiguous hallmarks be interpreted? And\, wha
 t is a reasonable approach towards the interpretation of the main benefit 
 test (MBT)? All these questions will be answered during this webinar organ
 ised in co-operation with Legitech. >>> Program Introduction Key features 
 of the disclosure regime Arrangements\, intermediaries and other interpret
 ation issues The hallmarks of reportable arrangements The main benefit tes
 t (MBT) – Developing a reasonable approach Managing DAC 6 obligations in
  practice Case studies The Real Estate Fund The Private Equity Fund DAC6Co
 nnect – The IT solution for DAC 6 reporting obligations ORATEURS OLIVER 
 R. HOOR Tax Partner and Head of Transfer Pricing\, ATOZ Tax Advisers Olive
 r is a Partner in the International & Corporate Tax department at ATOZ. A 
 tax professional since 2003\, Oliver has experience in Luxembourg and inte
 rnational taxation with a focus on alternative [...]
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
